Understand the application first, reuse reviewed organisation knowledge and evidence, surface missing information as Input Required, and keep every draft subject to human review.
Generic AI can write paragraphs, but it does not know whether a funding opportunity fits. FundRobin connects discovery, fit scoring, document context, and AI proposal generation so the first draft reflects the funder rather than a generic template.
Check eligibility, geography, deadline, and evidence needs before writing.
Bring in your project brief, budgets, case for support, and organisation profile.
Draft sections, collaborate, and refine against funder criteria.
Slow and expert-dependent, but often grounded in real funder requirements.
Fast, but easy to produce confident copy that ignores grant criteria or missing evidence.
Grant-specific AI that starts with the funding opportunity, your documents, and human review.
See how FundRobin combines funder requirements, reviewed organisation context, and stored evidence into an editable first draft for human review.
Grounded in reviewed organisation context and funder requirements
Traditional grant writing is a time-consuming, complex process that drains resources and limits your organization's impact potential.
Requirements and questions first
Reviewed knowledge and relevant evidence
Input Required, Sources, preview and approval
Our advanced AI system transforms the grant writing process through intelligent analysis, automated generation, and quality optimization.
FundRobin starts with the opportunity, funder requirements and exact application questions where they have been verified and are available. Multi-track opportunities can surface a strategy choice before drafting so the proposal has a clear direction.
FundRobin can plan a section structure around the application requirements and the chosen project direction. Where enabled, independent model approaches can inform the outline, but the plan remains part of a human-reviewed workflow rather than an autonomous funding decision.
Sections can use the grant requirements, project context, reviewed Organisation Brain knowledge and relevant source evidence. If a required organisational fact or decision is missing or conflicting, FundRobin can surface it as Input Required instead of filling the gap with invented detail.
Review sections individually, inspect material Sources where supported, collaborate through Notes and preview AI-proposed changes before saving. Word limits, version history and export tools support the workflow, while your team remains responsible for factual accuracy, eligibility and the final submission.
FundRobin combines funder and application requirements with relevant reviewed Organisation Brain knowledge, project context and source evidence. The aim is a more informed first draft with visible gaps and a clearer evidence trail — not an autonomous or guaranteed submission.
Material evidence where supported
Missing facts stay visible
People approve final changes
Smart Proposal can retrieve relevant reviewed Organisation Brain knowledge and evidence instead of treating a generic organisation profile as the only reusable context.
Project briefs and application-specific direction can guide the draft without turning those strategy choices into global organisational facts.
Where verified application questions are available, proposal work can follow the funder’s real questions and constraints. Multi-track opportunities can ask you to choose the direction before drafting.
Sections remain editable and reviewable. Missing context can become Input Required, material Sources can be inspected where supported, and AI-proposed changes can be previewed before your team saves them.
Uses relevant requirements, reviewed knowledge and evidence
Understands the opportunity before drafting
Reuses reviewed organisational knowledge when relevant
Surfaces missing facts and decisions for people to resolve
Shows material evidence behind proposal work where supported
Edit, preview, collaborate and export before submission
A guided tour of the dedicated research workspace — surface a funder's priorities, recent grants, and giving history before you write a single line.
Behind every proposal sits a continuously-enriched profile of the funder — their strategic priorities, what they fund, what they reject, and the language they expect. That's the difference between a draft you submit and one you rewrite.
Nine structured intelligence fields, refreshed continuously and fed straight into the proposal drafter.
What this funder actually cares about right now
Realistic ask sizes based on giving history
How they think about impact and change
Programme types they fund vs. avoid
Hard exclusions to keep you out of the bin pile
Formal, plain English, evidence-led — matched per funder
The metrics they expect to see in your case
Themes and sectors they actively fund
Who their giving is ultimately meant to reach
Ongoing
supported sources and open or rolling opportunities are revisited through recurring processing.
360Giving · IRS · State registries · Perplexity · Grants.gov · LinkedIn
Cross-referenced and de-duplicated — no fake or stale entries.
Missing one? Drop a URL.
We profile and add it to your workspace — privately, just for your team.
Invitation-only calls, internal funder docs, RFPs received by email — upload them and FundRobin treats them like any other matched opportunity. Strictly visible to your organisation only.
Funder briefs, application forms, scoring rubrics — drop them all in one go.
Member portals, intranet links, Google Doc briefs — we extract what matters.
Paste an invitation email and we structure it into a usable opportunity.
Add Q&A clarifications, budget templates, or assessor feedback at any point.
Stored in an isolated bucket scoped to your organisation. Never indexed, never shared with other tenants, never converted to public. Marked with a 🔒 Private pill across the platform.
Your private opportunity gets the same eligibility scoring, AI match rationale, and one-click proposal drafting as every public opportunity in the discovery feed.
Central & Local Authority
Funding
Grants
Applications
Funding
Funding
Word-count and response-constraint visibility
Application-question and requirement awareness
Input Required for unresolved facts or decisions
Human review before final submission
Choose Growth or Impact, or contact us for bespoke requirements.
£470.40 billed annually
For organisations building a consistent funding pipeline
SubscribeApply for Showcase Trial£1,910.40 billed annually
For organisations managing a higher-volume funding programme
SubscribeApply for Showcase TrialFor integrations, procurement and bespoke requirements
Contact FundRobinCrawlable facts for buyers, grant teams, and answer engines.
Plain-language facts extracted from this page for buyers, grant teams, and AI search.
Smart Proposal helps teams turn funder requirements, project context, reviewed organisation knowledge and relevant evidence into editable first drafts without removing human control.
Where verified application questions and constraints are available, proposal work can follow them. Robin can use relevant Organisation Brain knowledge and funder context rather than treating generic text as organisation evidence.
Source provenance can show material evidence behind proposal work where supported. Missing or conflicting information can be surfaced as Input Required; it is never permission to invent an answer.
FundRobin brings discovery, fit scoring, proposal drafting, documents, and follow-up into one customer workflow so teams can act on funding intelligence instead of copying it between tools.
Grounded AI grant writing uses relevant funder or application requirements, reviewed organisation knowledge and source evidence as context for drafting instead of relying only on the general knowledge of an AI model. Grounding improves relevance and inspectability, but the applicant must still review the final content.
Smart Proposal can retrieve relevant reviewed Organisation Brain knowledge and Library evidence for the application. That helps teams reuse current mission, beneficiary, outcome, delivery and track-record context without copying the same background into every new draft.
Where FundRobin has verified application questions and response constraints, proposal work can be structured around those exact questions. If the current questions are not available, the workflow should not imply that FundRobin has them.
FundRobin can surface unresolved facts, project choices or conflicting organisation context as Input Required. A missing fact is not permission for the AI to invent an answer; a person remains responsible for resolving the gap.
Where proposal provenance is supported, the Sources view can show material evidence that actually informed the work. FundRobin distinguishes materially used sources from other retrieval candidates rather than implying every candidate influenced the draft.
Proposal sections remain editable. Robin can summarise Notes, suggest actions and prepare section changes where supported, but proposed edits are previewed before a user chooses whether to save them.
No. FundRobin helps teams interpret requirements, organise evidence and prepare stronger first drafts, but it does not guarantee eligibility, compliance, funding success or automatic submission. The applicant remains responsible for the final application.
Use grounded AI drafting with human review built into the workflow.